On dishonest defence of post-Vatican 2 sweeping liturgical changes

By the learned and articulate Fr. Hunwicke.

The claim, explicit or implicit, that these things were ‘ordered by the Council’, is a wantonly and grossly mendacious retrojection. It bears the finger-prints of the Father of Lies himself. Most of the Council Fathers expected a very much more modest reform. That is why only four voted against the draft decree. The Fathers certainly did not anticipate the displacement, however optional, of the Roman Canon — a move which is not even hinted at in the Decree.

Sock-em bust-em.

1 Comment

  1. Jim Bowman says:

    Reblogged this on Blithe Spirit and commented:

    Vigorous rewriting of rewriting of history . . .

    Like

Leave a reply to Jim Bowman Cancel reply